The alliance of objective static analysis and AI-powered fixing, to keep technical debt and security continuously under control. Every change analyzed, every agent fix verified by NDepend.
Static analysis only? NDepend runs fully without AI. See the features ↓
CatalogContextSeed. rethrows after a successful retry:
the caller sees the seed fail although it succeeded.
It pays off twice: agents imitate the code they read, so the lower the entropy, the better the code they write next.
| Your coding agent alone | Steered by NDepend.AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Which issues | Agent aloneThe ones it spots in the code and in the build warnings | With NDepend.AIExactly the set you choose with a C# LINQ query: a rule, the vulnerabilities, the new issues since a baseline… from NDepend rules, Roslyn Analyzers and ReSharper |
| Is it really fixed? | Agent aloneThe agent says so, or you ask an AI to review the fixes | With NDepend.AIA deterministic, token-free analysis decides: an issue counts as fixed only when NDepend no longer reports it |
| Subtle code behavior changes | Agent aloneLost somewhere in a big diff | With NDepend.AIAn AI reviews each changed method against its original version, and restores what should not have changed: 63 methods reviewed on eShopOnWeb, 1 restored |
| Issues added by the fixes | Agent aloneUnnoticed, unless they show up as build warnings | With NDepend.AICaught and repaired by the sweep that follows the fix rounds, without undoing the fixes |
| Staying on track | Agent aloneIt can drift or stop early, then you prompt it again. Each session goes its own way | With NDepend.AINo drift: fix rounds, each one followed by a build, the impacted tests and a new analysis. Two runs on the same code differ by less than 1% |
| Tests and coverage | Agent aloneTests and a coverage measure only if you ask, maybe slow integration tests you don't notice | With NDepend.AIAims for 100% coverage with fast unit tests that assert something. No integration tests unless you ask. A bug found while writing tests is reported, not swept under the rug |
| Tokens | Agent aloneIt explores the code base to understand it | With NDepend.AIThe agent gets each issue with its exact location, no exploring: up to 30% fewer tokens |
| At the end | Agent aloneA big diff and the agent's summary | With NDepend.AIA report: issues fixed, tests, coverage, quality gates, potential bugs, cost, and the technical debt delta that shows the entropy going down |
NDepend.AI is optional. Nothing in NDepend calls an AI unless you run it, and your code never leaves your machine.
NDepend.AI steers, your agent edits the code
You steer, your agent asks NDepend
Your script asks NDepend for the issues
/IssueCheck and /QualityGateCheck analyze the code without building a reportSame analysis, same rules, same baseline as in Visual Studio, VisualNDepend and your reports.
where i.Severity >= Severity.High
The features 12,000+ companies rely on, in Visual Studio, VisualNDepend and your CI/CD pipeline.
Navigate your code and make better structural decisions with the most powerful code dependency graph available in the developer tools space.
Focus on the issues, vulnerabilities and regressions introduced since a baseline, whoever wrote the code: your team or your agents. Quality gates written in C# pass or fail your build.
Generated in seconds by a DevOps task, the report gives developers and management an all-in-one view: diff, issues, regressions, coverage and effort to fix.
The analysis runs on your premises. Your code never leaves your infrastructure.
Reports are generated in seconds, on Windows, Linux and macOS, from any CI/CD.
Rules and quality gates are C# LINQ queries, easy to adapt to what matters for your organization.
Fix what changed since a baseline instead of halting work for weeks on legacy issues.
"NDepend is giving me insight into my apps that I hadn't had before. Once I realized the depth and breadth of the information I was looking at, I was like a kid in a candy shop."
"As someone who gets to work with other people code daily I found NDepend to be a real life saver in such cases."
"The issues NDepend raised for me seemed to be more related to architecture issues versus the other tools. It definitely gave me insight into what to refactor and how to reduce technical debt."
"Wintellect is happy to recommend NDepend to its clients to use it internally when working on our customer's code."
"Tools like NDepend are required for teams dealing with proper code reviews, examining code when code is idle (like on weekends), or when you have a possible circular reference in play.
NDepend not only has a great static code analysis tool, but also provides a way for veteran developers and aspiring architects alike to adhere to coding standards along with a way to integrate a company's coding standards into the tool using CQLINQ.This is definitely a tool for advanced developers and one that I definitely recommend to anyone looking to analyze a code base."
"NDepend found enough problems in my code. Some of them are really helpful. I like that NDepend found 10 classes which can be changed to structures. Structures are extremely effective from the memory pressure perspectives. This is especially important when we're talking about mobile applications."
Try NDepend free on your own .NET code.
Download Trial